The website www.at.gov.lv uses only technically necessary cookies that ensure the operation and functionality of the website More information
20.07.2004. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-395/2004
Rulings of courts of both instances are annulled and the criminal case is remitted for further pre-trial investigation, as the charge presented does not meet the requirements of Section 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code
25.05.2004. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-247/2004
Rulings of both previous courts are annulled because the decision to hold the accused criminally liable does not comply with the provisions of Section 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code
20.01.2004. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-12/2004
The case was rightly sent for further investigation, as the prosecution did not meet the requirements of Section 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code
10.12.2002. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-572/2002
Vague charge that does not meet the requirements of Section 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code was excluded from the statement of charges, as a result of which the sentence was also reduced
12.02.2002. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-28/2002
The judgments of the first instance and appellate courts have been annulled, the case was transferred to the prosecutor for pre-trial investigation, because the decision to hold the defendant criminally liable does not meet the conditions of Section 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code
18.09.2001. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-290/2001
The decision of the first instance court on sending the case for subsidiary pre-trial investigation was canceled because the court erraneously interpreted provisions of Section 146, paragraph two of the Latvian Code of Criminal Procedure
13.02.2001. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-42/2001
Due to the violation of Section 146 of the Latvian Code of Criminal Procedure during the pre-trial investigation, which was manifested in the drafting of an imprecise and incomprehensible wording of the statement of charges, the decision of the appellate court was canceled and the case was referred to a pre-trial investigation
12.10.1999. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-300/1999
The court cannot make a lawful and reasoned judgment if the prosecution decision contains serious deficiencies and does not meet the requirements of Article 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code
28.09.1999. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-252/1999
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code, the wording of the accusation must be precise, specific and understandable
24.11.1998. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-365/1998
Judgments of the courts of first instance and appellate courts are quashed by referral of the case to the prosecutor because the decision to prosecute the accused under Article 161.2 of the Latvian Criminal Code does not comply with the requirements of Article 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code
25.08.1998. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-276/1998
The judgment has been set aside and the case has been referred for further pre-trial investigation for violation of Articles 19 and 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code
16.12.1997. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-348/1997
Judgments of the courts of first and appellate instance have been annulled by referring the case to the prosecutor for pre-trial investigation, because the decision to prosecute the accused under Section 103 of the Latvian Criminal Code does not meet the requirements of Section 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code
28.05.1996. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-115/1996
On the direct conformity and consistency of the descriptive part of the indictment with the accusation presented to the accused
